Representative Charles Rangel of New York

In attempting to sc ar American at the thought of going to state of war with Iraq, vocalization Charles Rangel of New York proposed a bill to reinstate the armed services draft. His purpose was not to argue the draft itself, except to collect Americans aware of the perils of going to war and the inequity in the current military. Ironically, four years later, the war is a reality, and so is the draft. Reinstating the military draft entrust serve the USs failing military both abroad and at home.First of all, the draft in the 21st century would need to be fair. some(prenominal) a(prenominal) people fear the draft because it is well known that the lower socioeconomic levels and minorities are disproportionately delineate in the fighting military today. As a matter of fact, more(prenominal) than 30 percent of the nations military is made up of minorities (Rangel Introduces a Bill to Reinstate Draft, 2003). The juvenile draft would make everyone between the ages of 20 to 26 (or p erhaps as materialization as 18 and as mature as 28) register and serve.Thus, the draft is perceived as more fair. One reason more young people dont serve now is the fear that while theyre wearing the uniform, their peers will be out having sport and getting a leg up in their careers. If everyone were required to serve, no one would feel alike a sucker (Moskos and Glastris, 2001). However, the idea of sending every college aged kid overseas to carry a gun is an outdated vision of the draft. Nowadays, the military needs more than just professional soldiers. Plenty of duties are available for those draftees (and volunteers) that are made available with the draft. As Moskos and Glastris (2001) note, we are now dealing with a shadowed enemy rather than an obvious platoon of marching troops. The new enemy is everywhere terrorism. That terrorists might poison municipal water supplies, spray anthrax from crop dusters, or suicidally infect themselves with small pox and stroll by dint of busy city streets, is no longer considered farfetched.That we might need to draft some of our people to foreknow these threatsnow thats considered farfetched, to the extent that its considered at all (Moskos and Glastris, 2001). Fighting this war will take more manpower than the United States currently has. This manpower will not necessarily be in trenches or tanks. They will be doing duties that many Americans do not realizes are needed.These jobs include federal armed personnel to harbour dams, nuclear power plants, sports complexes, and U. S. embassies abroad more border patrol and customs agents to keep terrorists and their weapons from entering the state of matter more INS agents track down immigrants who have overstayed their visas more coast guard personnel to inspect ships more air marshals to ride on passenger jets and more FBI agents to uncover terrorist cells still operating at bottom and outside our bordersborder guards, customs agents, anthrax inoculators, or d isaster-relief specialists (Moskos and Glastris, 2001).None of these jobs require tactical war skills. In addition, many individuals do not understand the in a perfect situation, troops would not serve for much(prenominal) long terms. Now, with the shortage of soldiers in Iraq, many troops are being redeployed two and three times. A draft would solve this problem. In Bosnia or Kosovo, the average time of deployment was only six months (Moskos and Glastris, 2001).The short duration for draftees would be less daunting than the commove the current military is bearing. The idea of the draft of previous decades is not the same draft as the one of this era simply because the war landscape is different. Fairly distributing the burden and reducing terms is one difference that many will notice. In addition, these individuals will serve at duties not necessarily on the front lines, but in positions of homeland security due to the new type of war on terror.With the guarantee that all will s erve in a agency that is appropriate for them, people have a better chance of becoming that a draft is indispensable to continue the freedoms that all Americans enjoy. References Moskos, C. & Glastris, P. (2001). Now Do You Believe We Need A Draft? Washington periodical 4 June 2007 from http//www. washingtonmonthly. com/features/ 2001/0111. moskos. glastris. html Rangel Introduces a bill to reinstate draft. (2003). CNN. Com Inside Politics. Retrieved 4 June 2007 from http//www. cnn. com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel. draft/